Skip Navigation
 
 

Workforce Heterogeneity

One of the goals of Frontiers is to advocate and facilitate the recruitment, retention and overall success of a multidisciplinary translational workforce that encompasses investigators, trainees, and community partners from across all our partner institutions. Additionally, we seek to foster an environment where the integration of multiple perspectives is valued as an essential asset for generating knowledge to benefit all patients and communities.

Resources for becoming a Clinical and Translational Science Researcher

This informational toolkit provides a variety of resources and guides to help early career faculty in medicine and science learn about and prepare to become independent clinical and translational science researchers. It also provides insight into the role of mentorship as a key component for a successful research career and how to prepare for the KL2 Mentored Career Development Award and other types of K award programs through the NIH individual development awards program. 

Much of the information for these resources is adapted from C. Michael Stein’s 2018 book Not Discussed: - the unspoken rules for a career in academic medical research. This is an excellent resource for anyone considering academic medical research.
 

Do you want to be a researcher?

Do you want to be a researcher? Perhaps the first thing you might want to do is decide if you want to be a researcher.  If you are still deciding if research is for you, the following resources may help.

First, there are many types of career trajectories in academic medicine. The following table is a snapshot of your potential career choices. (Note these are guidelines not absolutes.)

The Five Major Career Tracks in Academic Medicine

 

Physcian-Scientist

Clinican-Scholar/Educator

Medical Center Clinican

Tenure Track Scientist

Non-Tenure Track Scientist

Clinical

20%

80%

100%

0%

0%

Research

80%

20% Research, Education, Scholarly, Activity

0%

100%

100%

PI of NIH grants

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Tenure Track

Yes

Not at most institutions

No

Yes

No

Primary yardsticks

Grants, Papers, Reputation

Clinical, Scholarship, Reputation

Clinical

Grants, Papers, Reputation

Papers, Research team, Reputation

Secondary yardsticks

Citizenship, Clinical work, Teaching

Citizenship

Citizenship

Citizenship, Teaching

Citzenship

Title: Not Discussed: The Unspoken Rules for a Career in Academic Medical Research

Author: Charles Michael Stein

Publisher: C. Michael Stein, 2018

 

The following videos explain the field of translational research and what it is like to be a clinical and translational science scholar.

-  NCATS Video – What is Translational Research - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnHLo-hCssg

-  Video – Translational Science Scholar Perspective
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-_lsO9dsgY

If you are still deciding, here are some ways to help.

            1. Self-Assessment

            Ask yourself…

•  Do I enjoy solving open-ended, ambiguous problems?

• Am I okay with delayed gratification (papers, grants take years)?

• Would I be excited to lead a research team one day?

•  Do I like writing, presenting, and thinking about unanswered questions?

•   Do I want a career judged by publications, grants, and reputation?
 

If you said “yes” to most — research might be a good fit.

 If “no,” clinical excellence, teaching, or QI may suit you better.

2. Questions to Ask Academic Researchers

Use these in informal interviews:

•   What’s your week actually like (research vs. clinic vs. admin)?

•   Why did you choose research?

•   What surprised or challenged you most?

•   How do you protect research time?

•   How did you find your first funding?

•   What’s your favorite and least favorite part of the job?

Consider talking to at least 3 people at different stages (early-career, mid-career, senior).

3. Ways to Explore Without Committing Fully

Try one or more of the following:           

Action

Outcome

Join a research team for 3–6 months

See process up close

Shadow a clinician-researcher

Learn daily realities

Attend research-in-progress seminars

Understand how ideas are shaped

Draft or co-author a paper

See what writing entails

Read a grant (or Specific Aims page)

Understand the storytelling and structure

Meet with a K awardee

Learn about protected time & career paths

The importance of mentorship in becoming an academic researcher

Successful researchers are not born, they are made with the help of others. Mentorship is a key component of a research career. Mentorship in research is more than guidance: it’s a transformative partnership that nurtures scientific skills, emotional resilience, independence, and a research identity. It supports both technical and soft-skill development, fosters innovation, and opens doors within academia. For mentors, it refines leadership and shapes a legacy; for institutions, it strengthens culture and retention. The following links provide more information about key aspects of mentorship.

Types of Mentors and Identifying your Mentorship Needs

Different types of mentors may support you through different stages of your career. Here are just a few examples:

Example Membership Types Description
Research Mentor Provides guidance on research design, grant writing, publishing, and developing a scholarly trajectory. Key for building an academic portfolio. 
Clinical Mentor Supports growth in clinical expertise, patient care, and navigating specialty-specific practice challenges.
Career Development Mentor Helps with setting long-term career goals, promotion and tenure processes, and balancing competing professional demands.
Sponsoring Mentor (Sponsor/Advocate) Actively uses their reputation and networks to create opportunities, recommend the mentee for awards, committees or leadership roles. 
Administrative/Leadership Mentor Guides development of leadership, management, and administrative skills, including committee work and program direction.


Finding a mentor begins with understanding yourself and your needs. From here you can identify your goals and what mentor characteristics can best support them. Harvard Catalyst provides a user guide that walks you through each of these processes.
 

Finding a mentor begins with understanding yourself and your needs. From here you can identify your goals and what mentor characteristics can best support them. Harvard Catalyst provides a user guide that walks you through each of these processes.

Finding and Choosing a Mentor

For a quick overview of finding a mentor, check out the National Academies podcast on Finding a Mentor.

There are good reasons and not-so-good reasons for selecting a mentor. Stein (2018) has this convenient table to quickly spot the difference:
Poor reasons for choosing a mentor:

Timing Dr. X rounded with me first and suggested a project
Admiration  Dr. X is a wonderful clinical and role model
Subservience  The Chief of X offered me a project
Familiarity Dr. X was my chief resident
Gulliable Dr. X was so enthusiastic
Obligation At the time, I couldn't say no to Dr. X
Spur of the Moment Dr. X and I saw a case and thought up an easy project

 

Good reasons for choosing a mentor:

Success Dr. X published 50 papers, has 2 ROIs and mentored
Time Dr. X makes times for trainees
Expertise  Dr. X is internationally recognized in my research area
Resources  Dr. X has the funding, equipment and technicians I need
Character Dr. X is enthusiastic, supportive, fair and I like...
Clout Dr. X has influence in my institution and nationally


Stein (2018) also provides a clear snapshot of mentor characteristics to look for and avoid:  
 

Perfect Mentor* Imperfect Mentor
1. Teacher 1. Absentee landlord
2. Sponsor (Godfather, fixer) 2. Benevolant landlord
3. Advisor 3. Dictator
4. Agent (Lobbyist, advocate) 4. Self-promoter
5. Role Model 5. Jerk
6. Coach 6. Parent, judge, critic, taskmaster
7. Confidante 7. Gossip
8. Giver 8. Taker
9. Mind reader 9. Steam roller
10. Plays well with others 10. Throws toys
11. Able to let go 11. Hangs on
12. Observes boundaries 12. Poor boundary recognition
13. Can read a map 13. Wanders all over the place
14. Is not responsible for you 14. Is responsible for you. 

*The first seven characteristics of a perfect mentor are from: Tobin MJ.: Mentoring; seven roles and some specifics. American Journal of Respitory and Critical Care Medicine. 2004 Jul 15; 170(2); 114-7.

Working with a mentor

Once you have identified mentors, there are several resources to support mentoring relationships. Including:

The Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research is a go-to resource for mentoring questions, training, and scholarship. CIMER (https://cimerproject.org/)

National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) is another resource supporting all aspects of mentorship with resources targeted specifically for early career researchers.

These resources can be shared with your mentor. You may find other videos important to share as well such as Mentoring & Sponsoring those Under-Represented in Research in Science.

Here are common issues to consider when working with a mentor and how you might address them:

Common Issues How to address them
Clarifying Expectations
  • Define roles, goals and boundaries early (e.g. research output, career advice, networking).
  • Discuss communication preferences and frequency of meetings
Setting Goals and Accountability
  • Establish short- and long-term goals with clear milestones
  • Take responsibility for driving the agenda and following up
Time and Availability
  • Mentors are often busy, respect their time by being prepared, concise and proactive.
  • Understand that availabiity may fluctuate and multiple mentors may be needed.
Alignment and Fit
  • Not every mentor can meet every need - consider a "mentorship team" for research, clinical, career and personal guidance.
  • Recognize when a relationship is mismatched and know it's okay to pivot.
Power-Dynamics and Professional Boundaries
  • Be aware of hierarchies in medicine that may affect openness and communication.
  • Maintain professionalism and understand what is appropriate to share.
Feedback and Communication
  • Seek and accept constructive feedback.
  • Be open, honest and clear about needs, progress and challenges.
Credit, Authorship and Intellectual Property
  • Discuss expectations about authorship order, project ownership, and contributions early.
  • Transparency prevents misunderstandgs in academic work.
Career Advancement and Sponosrship
  • Recognize the differences between a mentor (guides) and a sponsor (advocates).
  • Ask mentors to connect you to networks, committees and leadership opportunities.
Evolving Relationships
  • Mentorship needs changes over time; relationships may deepen, shift or end.
  • Revist goals regularly and adjust expectations as your career advances.
   


For more information about the importance of mentorship, visit:

            National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM

            UW-Madison Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research (CIMER) - Research Publication Library 
           

Grant Writing Resources and Tips

In addition to resources provided by Frontiers, here are some tips and links to support grant writing:

First, familiarize yourself with the writing format and Federal Resources:

  • Learn the NIH format. NIH is the world's largest awarder of biomedical research grants, and their format is commonly used by other grant agencies as well. Use the NIH RePORTER to find grants at your institution or related to your interests.
     
  • Familiarize yourself with the Office of Extramural Research (OER), the arm of NIH that awards grants. Here you can find tips on applying for grants, writing grant applications, and additional grant opportunities.
     
  • Read sample grant applications. Ask colleagues to share successful applications or the examples provided by the NIH. (Be sure to scroll down to see example K-aware applications.)

Other helpful sites:

Books you may want to check out:

  • The Grant Application Writer’s Workbook (Russell & Morrison) – a widely recommended step-by-step manual. NIH Version
     
  • Winning Grants Step by Step (Carlson & O’Neal-McElrath)
Apply for KL2 and other K-Type Awards

Frontiers CTSI offers a KL2 Program designed to cultivate a skilled cadre of early-career clinical and translational researchers. The program features a tailored core curriculum that offers rigorous training in clinical and translational research, along with targeted career development activities. By equipping scholars with the skills, knowledge, and support they need to thrive, the KL2 Program fosters the next generation of leaders in translational science. The KL2 Program is offered as part of Frontier’s Education & Training.

Request For Applications

Questions regarding the program can be sent to the KL2 & TL1 Program Director, Holly Zink, Ph.D., MSA.

Other K type award opportunities include:

            K 23

            KUMC/Cancer Center K12 program

            Robert Wood Johnson awards

Know your Audience
Each K mechanism has a different audience.

Mechanism

Audience

Applicant Type

K01

Basic/behavioral researchers

Non-clinicians (PhD)

K08

Lab-based clinician-scientists

MD, lab work

K23

Patient-oriented research

MD/DO, clinical research

K99/R00

Transition to independence

Postdocs (non-clinical)


General Timeline for Preparing your Grant

Time Before Deadline

Key Tasks

9–12 months

Choose gran, draft aims

6–9 months

Preliminary data, mentor letters, career plan

3–6 months

Biosketches, institutional letters, refine proposal

1–3 months

Full draft to reviewers, mock study section

0–1 months

Final polish and submission

Going Deeper

Not everything can be summed up through online resources for there is always more to learn about becoming a translational science researcher. If you want to continue to learn more, we recommend the following:

Book: Not Discussed – the unspoken rules for a career in academic medical research by C. Michael Stein

Podcast Series:

            National Academies: The Science of Effective Mentoring in STEMM

            NIH: All About Grants Podcasts

Pathway Programs

The Workforce Heterogeneity core recognizes the many pathway programs that support students who are interested in medicine and science. The following pathway programs provide early opportunities for success in Translational Research and Science:  

STAR 2.0 (Children's Mercy Kansas City)

STAHR (UMKC)

K-PATHS

KU Medical Center K-12 Initiatives

Other programs supporting students and trainees: 

Mission Vision Project KC 

If you would like your program listed above, please contact the Frontiers Workforce Heterogeneity Navigator

 

Workforce Heterogeneity Contacts

Image of Bridgette Jones

Bridgette Jones, M.D., MS

Co-Lead Translational Endeavors

Link to Profile
Image of Carrie Francis

Carrie  Francis, M.D.

Workforce Heterogeneity Lead

Link to Biography
photo of Joanna

Joanna Weidler-Lewis, Ph.D.

Workforce Heterogeneity Navigator

Interested in Learning More?

One of our Navigators would be happy to assist you in learning more about their respective areas by contacting us below.

Contact Us
Back to Top